Community Page
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- The point here is that the burden fell on Apple as the employer to protect its competitive advantage without cutting off Fadell’s ability to make a living.Apple had to figure out how much it was...
- Apple could simply tell him he could not go to work for a competitor. Fadell’s expertise is in developing portable audio/video players, so this might make him choose between not working at all for...
- re [Full disclosure: I once carried a six pack of Czech Budweiser home from Prague] I have to admit to carrying an empty bottle of Czech Budweiser back to London after a business trip, nice to...
- I own common shares in a tech startup and added a convertible note to my position with the option to cash out in 2 years @ 12% interest or convert to common shares @30% discount. An angel group has...
- Hi Jay Thanks for the update. One thing I have been doing is unplugging my TVs, Stereos, and other items around the house that are not in use and that has greatly saved me on my electric bill.
Jump to original thread »
Mark Cuban posts an interesting read on his blog about the multiparty negotiations required to pull off the merger. The full description is worth a read, but the essential points are here:
*Youtube had rapidly mounting copyright complaints from content owners large and small. Revenue-share offers to the major studios didn’t go […] ... Continue reading »
*Youtube had rapidly mounting copyright complaints from content owners large and small. Revenue-share offers to the major studios didn’t go […] ... Continue reading »
0 comments
This thread has no comments yet.
Please login to comment.