<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Blog comments - Latest Comments in Twitter&amp;#8217;s First-Mover Advantage and Disadvantage</title><link>http://park3tumblr.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://park3tumblr.disqus.com/twitter8217s_first_mover_advantage_and_disadvantage/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 17:52:08 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twitter&amp;#8217;s First-Mover Advantage and Disadvantage</title><link>http://blog.jparkhill.com/2008/08/02/twitters-first-mover-advantage-and-disadvantage/#comment-1139134</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the quote. I agree. It defined it's niche and others are only copying. They do need some stability with their back-end (to avoid the dreaded Fail Whale) and new features (as soon in piggy-back products like Twitteriffic), and they need to create a structure that can grow. Otherwise they will choke on their own success.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mdurwin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 17:52:08 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>